rebase

docs/build/html/_sources/usage/compile.rst

@@ -130,8 +130,8 @@ Now make an array, and benchmark both functions:
 .. code-block:: python
 
   x = mx.random.uniform(shape=(32, 1000, 4096))
-  timeit(nn.gelu, x)
-  timeit(mx.compile(nn.gelu), x)
+  timeit(gelu, x)
+  timeit(mx.compile(gelu), x)
 
 On an M1 Max the times are 15.5 and 3.1 milliseconds. The compiled ``gelu`` is
 five times faster.

docs/build/html/_sources/usage/distributed.rst

@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ almost identical to the example above:
 
     def step(model, x, y):
         loss, grads = loss_grad_fn(model, x, y)
-        grads = mlx.nn.average_gradients(grads) # <---- This line was added
+        grads = mx.nn.average_gradients(grads)  # <---- This line was added
         optimizer.update(model, grads)
         return loss
 

docs/build/html/_sources/usage/export.rst

@@ -164,11 +164,11 @@ to export a function which can be used for inputs with variable shapes:
 
 .. code-block:: python
 
-  mx.export_function("fun.mlxfn", mx.abs, mx.array(0.0), shapeless=True)
+  mx.export_function("fun.mlxfn", mx.abs, mx.array([0.0]), shapeless=True)
   imported_abs = mx.import_function("fun.mlxfn")
 
   # Ok
-  out, = imported_abs(mx.array(-1.0))
+  out, = imported_abs(mx.array([-1.0]))
 
   # Also ok
   out, = imported_abs(mx.array([-1.0, -2.0]))