Non-existent upstream is not fatal (#30746)
A non-existent upstream should not be fatal: it could only mean it is not deployed yet. In the meantime, it should not block the user to rebuild anything it needs. A warning is still emitted, to let the user decide if this is ok or not.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1064,9 +1064,7 @@ def _read(self):
|
||||
self._state_is_inconsistent = False
|
||||
return
|
||||
elif self.is_upstream:
|
||||
raise UpstreamDatabaseLockingError(
|
||||
"No database index file is present, and upstream"
|
||||
" databases cannot generate an index file")
|
||||
tty.warn('upstream not found: {0}'.format(self._index_path))
|
||||
|
||||
def _add(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user