zhangyiss/spack
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add documentation about package signing model (#30939)

Browse Source 
Co-authored-by: Scott Wittenburg <scott.wittenburg@kitware.com>
Co-authored-by: Massimiliano Culpo <massimiliano.culpo@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Christopher Kotfila
2023-06-07 17:05:44 -04:00
committed by GitHub
parent 79656655ba
commit 785c1a2070
2 changed files with 485 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
lib/spack/docs/index.rst
View File

@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ or refer to the full manual below.
chain chain
extensions extensions
pipelines pipelines
signing
.. toctree:: .. toctree::
:maxdepth: 2 :maxdepth: 2

484
lib/spack/docs/signing.rst Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,484 @@
.. Copyright 2013-2022 Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC and other
Spack Project Developers. See the top-level COPYRIGHT file for details.
SPDX-License-Identifier: (Apache-2.0 OR MIT)
.. _signing:
=====================
Spack Package Signing
=====================
The goal of package signing in Spack is to provide data integrity
assurances around official packages produced by the automated Spack CI
pipelines. These assurances directly address the security of Spack’s
software supply chain by explaining why a security-conscious user can
be reasonably justified in the belief that packages installed via Spack
have an uninterrupted auditable trail back to change management
decisions judged to be appropriate by the Spack maintainers. This is
achieved through cryptographic signing of packages built by Spack CI
pipelines based on code that has been transparently reviewed and
approved on GitHub. This document describes the signing process for
interested users.
.. _risks:
------------------------------
Risks, Impact and Threat Model
------------------------------
This document addresses the approach taken to safeguard Spack’s
reputation with regard to the integrity of the package data produced by
Spack’s CI pipelines. It does not address issues of data confidentiality
(Spack is intended to be largely open source) or availability (efforts
are described elsewhere). With that said the main reputational risk can
be broadly categorized as a loss of faith in the data integrity due to a
breach of the private key used to sign packages. Remediation of a
private key breach would require republishing the public key with a
revocation certificate, generating a new signing key, an assessment and
potential rebuild/resigning of all packages since the key was breached,
and finally direct intervention by every spack user to update their copy
of Spack’s public keys used for local verification.
The primary threat model used in mitigating the risks of these stated
impacts is one of individual error not malicious intent or insider
threat. The primary objective is to avoid the above impacts by making a
private key breach nearly impossible due to oversight or configuration
error. Obvious and straightforward measures are taken to mitigate issues
of malicious interference in data integrity and insider threats but
these attack vectors are not systematically addressed. It should be hard
to exfiltrate the private key intentionally, and almost impossible to
leak the key by accident.
.. _overview:
-----------------
Pipeline Overview
-----------------
Spack pipelines build software through progressive stages where packages
in later stages nominally depend on packages built in earlier stages.
For both technical and design reasons these dependencies are not
implemented through the default GitLab artifacts mechanism; instead
built packages are uploaded to AWS S3 mirrors (buckets) where they are
retrieved by subsequent stages in the pipeline. Two broad categories of
pipelines exist: Pull Request (PR) pipelines and Develop/Release
pipelines.
- PR pipelines are launched in response to pull requests made by
trusted and untrusted users. Packages built on these pipelines upload
code to quarantined AWS S3 locations which cache the built packages
for the purposes of review and iteration on the changes proposed in
the pull request. Packages built on PR pipelines can come from
untrusted users so signing of these pipelines is not implemented.
Jobs in these pipelines are executed via normal GitLab runners both
within the AWS GitLab infrastructure and at affiliated institutions.
- Develop and Release pipelines **sign** the packages they produce and carry
strong integrity assurances that trace back to auditable change management
decisions. These pipelines only run after members from a trusted group of
reviewers verify that the proposed changes in a pull request are appropriate.
Once the PR is merged, or a release is cut, a pipeline is run on protected
GitLab runners which provide access to the required signing keys within the
job. Intermediary keys are used to sign packages in each stage of the
pipeline as they are built and a final job officially signs each package
external to any specific packages’ build environment. An intermediate key
exists in the AWS infrastructure and for each affiliated instritution that
maintains protected runners. The runners that execute these pipelines
exclusively accept jobs from protected branches meaning the intermediate keys
are never exposed to unreviewed code and the official keys are never exposed
to any specific build environment.
.. _key_architecture:
----------------
Key Architecture
----------------
Spack’s CI process uses public-key infrastructure (PKI) based on GNU Privacy
Guard (gpg) keypairs to sign public releases of spack package metadata, also
called specs. Two classes of GPG keys are involved in the process to reduce the
impact of an individual private key compromise, these key classes are the
*Intermediate CI Key* and *Reputational Key*. Each of these keys has signing
sub-keys that are used exclusively for signing packages. This can be confusing
so for the purpose of this explanation we’ll refer to Root and Signing keys.
Each key has a private and a public component as well as one or more identities
and zero or more signatures.
-------------------
Intermediate CI Key
-------------------
The Intermediate key class is used to sign and verify packages between stages
within a develop or release pipeline. An intermediate key exists for the AWS
infrastructure as well as each affiliated institution that maintains protected
runners. These intermediate keys are made available to the GitLab execution
environment building the package so that the package’s dependencies may be
verified by the Signing Intermediate CI Public Key and the final package may be
signed by the Signing Intermediate CI Private Key.
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| **Intermediate CI Key (GPG)** |
+==================================================+======================================================+
| Root Intermediate CI Private Key (RSA 4096)# | Root Intermediate CI Public Key (RSA 4096) |
+--------------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------+
| Signing Intermediate CI Private Key (RSA 4096) | Signing Intermediate CI Public Key (RSA 4096) |
+--------------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------+
| Identity: “Intermediate CI Key <maintainers@spack.io>” |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Signatures: None |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
The *Root intermediate CI Private Key*\ Is stripped out of the GPG key and
stored offline completely separate from Spack’s infrastructure. This allows the
core development team to append revocation certificates to the GPG key and
issue new sub-keys for use in the pipeline. It is our expectation that this
will happen on a semi regular basis. A corollary of this is that *this key
should not be used to verify package integrity outside the internal CI process.*
----------------
Reputational Key
----------------
The Reputational Key is the public facing key used to sign complete groups of
development and release packages. Only one key pair exsits in this class of
keys. In contrast to the Intermediate CI Key the Reputational Key *should* be
used to verify package integrity. At the end of develop and release pipeline a
final pipeline job pulls down all signed package metadata built by the pipeline,
verifies they were signed with an Intermediate CI Key, then strips the
Intermediate CI Key signature from the package and re-signs them with the
Signing Reputational Private Key. The officially signed packages are then
uploaded back to the AWS S3 mirror. Please note that separating use of the
reputational key into this final job is done to prevent leakage of the key in a
spack package. Because the Signing Reputational Private Key is never exposed to
a build job it cannot accidentally end up in any built package.
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| **Reputational Key (GPG)** |
+==================================================+======================================================+
| Root Reputational Private Key (RSA 4096)# | Root Reputational Public Key (RSA 4096) |
+--------------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------+
| Signing Reputational Private Key (RSA 4096) | Signing Reputational Public Key (RSA 4096) |
+--------------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------+
| Identity: “Spack Project <maintainers@spack.io>” |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Signatures: Signed by core development team [#f1]_ |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
The Root Reputational Private Key is stripped out of the GPG key and stored
offline completely separate from Spack’s infrastructure. This allows the core
development team to append revocation certificates to the GPG key in the
unlikely event that the Signing Reputation Private Key is compromised. In
general it is the expectation that rotating this key will happen infrequently if
at all. This should allow relatively transparent verification for the end-user
community without needing deep familiarity with GnuPG or Public Key
Infrastructure.
.. _build_cache_format:
------------------
Build Cache Format
------------------
A binary package consists of a metadata file unambiguously defining the
built package (and including other details such as how to relocate it)
and the installation directory of the package stored as a compressed
archive file. The metadata files can either be unsigned, in which case
the contents are simply the json-serialized concrete spec plus metadata,
or they can be signed, in which case the json-serialized concrete spec
plus metadata is wrapped in a gpg cleartext signature. Built package
metadata files are named to indicate the operating system and
architecture for which the package was built as well as the compiler
used to build it and the packages name and version. For example::
linux-ubuntu18.04-haswell-gcc-7.5.0-zlib-1.2.12-llv2ysfdxnppzjrt5ldybb5c52qbmoow.spec.json.sig
would contain the concrete spec and binary metadata for a binary package
of ``zlib@1.2.12``, built for the ``ubuntu`` operating system and ``haswell``
architecture. The id of the built package exists in the name of the file
as well (after the package name and version) and in this case begins
with ``llv2ys``. The id distinguishes a particular built package from all
other built packages with the same os/arch, compiler, name, and version.
Below is an example of a signed binary package metadata file. Such a
file would live in the ``build_cache`` directory of a binary mirror::
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
{
"spec": {
<concrete-spec-contents-omitted>
},
"buildcache_layout_version": 1,
"binary_cache_checksum": {
"hash_algorithm": "sha256",
"hash": "4f1e46452c35a5e61bcacca205bae1bfcd60a83a399af201a29c95b7cc3e1423"
},
"buildinfo": {
"relative_prefix":
"linux-ubuntu18.04-haswell/gcc-7.5.0/zlib-1.2.12-llv2ysfdxnppzjrt5ldybb5c52qbmoow",
"relative_rpaths": false
}
}
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=3gvm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
If a user has trusted the public key associated with the private key
used to sign the above spec file, the signature can be verified with
gpg, as follows::
$ gpg –verify linux-ubuntu18.04-haswell-gcc-7.5.0-zlib-1.2.12-llv2ysfdxnppzjrt5ldybb5c52qbmoow.spec.json.sig
The metadata (regardless whether signed or unsigned) contains the checksum
of the ``.spack`` file containing the actual installation. The checksum should
be compared to a checksum computed locally on the ``.spack`` file to ensure the
contents have not changed since the binary spec plus metadata were signed. The
``.spack`` files are actually tarballs containing the compressed archive of the
install tree. These files, along with the metadata files, live within the
``build_cache`` directory of the mirror, and together are organized as follows::
build_cache/
# unsigned metadata (for indexing, contains sha256 of .spack file)
<arch>-<compiler>-<name>-<ver>-24zvipcqgg2wyjpvdq2ajy5jnm564hen.spec.json
# clearsigned metadata (same as above, but signed)
<arch>-<compiler>-<name>-<ver>-24zvipcqgg2wyjpvdq2ajy5jnm564hen.spec.json.sig
<arch>/
<compiler>/
<name>-<ver>/
# tar.gz-compressed prefix (may support more compression formats later)
<arch>-<compiler>-<name>-<ver>-24zvipcqgg2wyjpvdq2ajy5jnm564hen.spack
Uncompressing and extracting the ``.spack`` file results in the install tree.
This is in contrast to previous versions of spack, where the ``.spack`` file
contained a (duplicated) metadata file, a signature file and a nested tarball
containing the install tree.
.. _internal_implementation:
-----------------------
Internal Implementation
-----------------------
The technical implementation of the pipeline signing process includes components
defined in Amazon Web Services, the Kubernetes cluster, at affilicated
institutions, and the GitLab/GitLab Runner deployment. We present the techincal
implementation in two interdependent sections. The first addresses how secrets
are managed through the lifecycle of a develop or release pipeline. The second
section describes how Gitlab Runner and pipelines are configured and managed to
support secure automated signing.
Secrets Management
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
As stated above the Root Private Keys (intermediate and reputational)
are stripped from the GPG keys and stored outside Spack’s
infrastructure.
.. warning::
**TODO**
- Explanation here about where and how access is handled for these keys.
- Both Root private keys are protected with strong passwords
- Who has access to these and how?
**Intermediate CI Key**
-----------------------
Multiple intermediate CI signing keys exist, one Intermediate CI Key for jobs
run in AWS, and one key for each affiliated institution (e.g. Univerity of
Oregon). Here we describe how the Intermediate CI Key is managed in AWS:
The Intermediate CI Key (including the Signing Intermediate CI Private Key is
exported as an ASCII armored file and stored in a Kubernetes secret called
``spack-intermediate-ci-signing-key``. For convenience sake, this same secret
contains an ASCII-armored export of just the *public* components of the
Reputational Key. This secret also contains the *public* components of each of
the affiliated institutions' Intermediate CI Key. These are potentially needed
to verify dependent packages which may have been found in the public mirror or
built by a protected job running on an affiliated institution's infrastrcuture
in an earlier stage of the pipeline.
Procedurally the ``spack-intermediate-ci-signing-key`` secret is used in
the following way:
1. A ``large-arm-prot`` or ``large-x86-prot`` protected runner picks up
a job tagged ``protected`` from a protected GitLab branch. (See
`Protected Runners and Reserved Tags <#_8bawjmgykv0b>`__).
2. Based on its configuration, the runner creates a job Pod in the
pipeline namespace and mounts the spack-intermediate-ci-signing-key
Kubernetes secret into the build container
3. The Intermediate CI Key, affiliated institutions' public key and the
Reputational Public Key are imported into a keyring by the ``spack gpg …``
sub-command. This is initiated by the job’s build script which is created by
the generate job at the beginning of the pipeline.
4. Assuming the package has dependencies those specs are verified using
the keyring.
5. The package is built and the spec.json is generated
6. The spec.json is signed by the keyring and uploaded to the mirror’s
build cache.
**Reputational Key**
--------------------
Because of the increased impact to end users in the case of a private
key breach, the Reputational Key is managed separately from the
Intermediate CI Keys and has additional controls. First, the Reputational
Key was generated outside of Spack’s infrastructure and has been signed
by the core development team. The Reputational Key (along with the
Signing Reputational Private Key) was then ASCII armor exported to a
file. Unlike the Intermediate CI Key this exported file is not stored as
a base64 encoded secret in Kubernetes. Instead\ *the key file
itself*\ is encrypted and stored in Kubernetes as the
``spack-signing-key-encrypted`` secret in the pipeline namespace.
The encryption of the exported Reputational Key (including the Signing
Reputational Private Key) is handled by `AWS Key Management Store (KMS) data
keys
<https://docs.aws.amazon.com/kms/latest/developerguide/concepts.html#data-keys>`__.
The private key material is decrypted and imported at the time of signing into a
memory mounted temporary directory holding the keychain. The signing job uses
the `AWS Encryption SDK
<https://docs.aws.amazon.com/encryption-sdk/latest/developer-guide/crypto-cli.html>`__
(i.e. ``aws-encryption-cli``) to decrypt the Reputational Key. Permission to
decrypt the key is granted to the job Pod through a Kubernetes service account
specifically used for this, and only this, function. Finally, for convenience
sake, this same secret contains an ASCII-armored export of the *public*
components of the Intermediate CI Keys and the Reputational Key. This allows the
signing script to verify that packages were built by the pipeline (both on AWS
or at affiliated institutions), or signed previously as a part of a different
pipeline. This is is done *before* importing decrypting and importing the
Signing Reputational Private Key material and officially signing the packages.
Procedurally the ``spack-singing-key-encrypted`` secret is used in the
following way:
1. The ``spack-package-signing-gitlab-runner`` protected runner picks
up a job tagged ``notary`` from a protected GitLab branch (See
`Protected Runners and Reserved Tags <#_8bawjmgykv0b>`__).
2. Based on its configuration, the runner creates a job pod in the
pipeline namespace. The job is run in a stripped down purpose-built
image ``ghcr.io/spack/notary:latest`` Docker image. The runner is
configured to only allow running jobs with this image.
3. The runner also mounts the ``spack-signing-key-encrypted`` secret to
a path on disk. Note that this becomes several files on disk, the
public components of the Intermediate CI Keys, the public components
of the Reputational CI, and an AWS KMS encrypted file containing the
Singing Reputational Private Key.
4. In addition to the secret, the runner creates a tmpfs memory mounted
directory where the GnuPG keyring will be created to verify, and
then resign the package specs.
5. The job script syncs all spec.json.sig files from the build cache to
a working directory in the job’s execution environment.
6. The job script then runs the ``sign.sh`` script built into the
notary Docker image.
7. The ``sign.sh`` script imports the public components of the
Reputational and Intermediate CI Keys and uses them to verify good
signatures on the spec.json.sig files. If any signed spec does not
verify the job immediately fails.
8. Assuming all specs are verified, the ``sign.sh`` script then unpacks
the spec json data from the signed file in preparation for being
re-signed with the Reputational Key.
9. The private components of the Reputational Key are decrypted to
standard out using ``aws-encryption-cli`` directly into a ``gpg
–import …`` statement which imports the key into the
keyring mounted in-memory.
10. The private key is then used to sign each of the json specs and the
keyring is removed from disk.
11. The re-signed json specs are resynced to the AWS S3 Mirror and the
public signing of the packages for the develop or release pipeline
that created them is complete.
Non service-account access to the private components of the Reputational
Key that are managed through access to the symmetric secret in KMS used
to encrypt the data key (which in turn is used to encrypt the GnuPG key
- See:\ `Encryption SDK
Documentation <https://docs.aws.amazon.com/encryption-sdk/latest/developer-guide/crypto-cli-examples.html#cli-example-encrypt-file>`__).
A small trusted subset of the core development team are the only
individuals with access to this symmetric key.
.. _protected_runners:
Protected Runners and Reserved Tags
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Spack has a large number of Gitlab Runners operating in its build farm.
These include runners deployed in the AWS Kubernetes cluster as well as
runners deployed at affiliated institutions. The majority of runners are
shared runners that operate across projects in gitlab.spack.io. These
runners pick up jobs primarily from the spack/spack project and execute
them in PR pipelines.
A small number of runners operating on AWS and at affiliated institutions are
registered as specific *protected* runners on the spack/spack project. In
addition to protected runners there are protected branches on the spack/spack
project. These are the ``develop`` branch, any release branch (i.e. managed with
the ``releases/v*`` wildcard) and any tag branch (managed with the ``v*``
wildcard) Finally Spack’s pipeline generation code reserves certain tags to make
sure jobs are routed to the correct runners, these tags are ``public``,
``protected``, and ``notary``. Understanding how all this works together to
protect secrets and provide integrity assurances can be a little confusing so
lets break these down:
- **Protected Branches**- Protected branches in Spack prevent anyone
other than Maintainers in GitLab from pushing code. In the case of
Spack the only Maintainer level entity pushing code to protected
branches is Spack bot. Protecting branches also marks them in such a
way that Protected Runners will only run jobs from those branches
- **Protected Runners**- Protected Runners only run jobs from protected
branches. Because protected runners have access to secrets, it's critical
that they not run Jobs from untrusted code (i.e. PR branches). If they did it
would be possible for a PR branch to tag a job in such a way that a protected
runner executed that job and mounted secrets into a code execution
environment that had not been reviewed by Spack maintainers. Note however
that in the absence of tagging used to route jobs, public runners *could* run
jobs from protected branches. No secrets would be at risk of being breached
because non-protected runners do not have access to those secrets; lack of
secrets would, however, cause the jobs to fail.
- **Reserved Tags**- To mitigate the issue of public runners picking up
protected jobs Spack uses a small set of “reserved” job tags (Note that these
are *job* tags not git tags). These tags are “public”, “private”, and
“notary.” The majority of jobs executed in Spack’s GitLab instance are
executed via a ``generate`` job. The generate job code systematically ensures
that no user defined configuration sets these tags. Instead, the ``generate``
job sets these tags based on rules related to the branch where this pipeline
originated. If the job is a part of a pipeline on a PR branch it sets the
``public`` tag. If the job is part of a pipeline on a protected branch it
sets the ``protected`` tag. Finally if the job is the package signing job and
it is running on a pipeline that is part of a protected branch then it sets
the ``notary`` tag.
Protected Runners are configured to only run jobs from protected branches. Only
jobs running in pipelines on protected branches are tagged with ``protected`` or
``notary`` tags. This tightly couples jobs on protected branches to protected
runners that provide access to the secrets required to sign the built packages.
The secrets are can **only** be accessed via:
1. Runners under direct control of the core development team.
2. Runners under direct control of trusted maintainers at affiliated institutions.
3. By code running the automated pipeline that has been reviewed by the
Spack maintainers and judged to be appropriate.
Other attempts (either through malicious intent or incompetence) can at
worst grab jobs intended for protected runners which will cause those
jobs to fail alerting both Spack maintainers and the core development
team.
.. [#f1]
The Reputational Key has also cross signed core development team
keys.