Fix concretization bugs with virtuals and deptypes.
1. Fix #2807: Can't depend on virtual and non-virtual package - This is tested by test_my_dep_depends_on_provider_of_my_virtual_dep in the concretize.py test. - This was actually working in the test suite, but it depended on the order the dependencies were resolved in. Resolving non-virtual then virtual worked, but virtual, then non-virtual did not. - Problem was that an unnecessary copy was made of a spec that already had some dependencies set up, and the copy lost half of some of the dependency relationships. This caused the "can'd depend on X twice error". - Fix by eliminating unnecessary copy and ensuring that dep parameter of _merge_dependency is always safe to own -- i.e. it's a defensive copy from somewhere else. 2. Fix bug and simplify concretization of deptypes. - deptypes weren't being accumulated; they were being set on each DependencySpec. This could cause concretization to get into an infinite loop. - Fixed by accumulating deptypes in DependencySpec.update_deptypes() - Also simplified deptype normalization logic: deptypes are now merged in constrain() like everything else -- there is no need to merge them specially or to look at dpeendents in _merge_dependency(). - Add some docstrings to deptype tests.
This commit is contained in:
parent
fe6f39b662
commit
7f3f493024
@ -581,8 +581,11 @@ def __init__(self, parent, spec, deptypes):
|
||||
self.deptypes = tuple(sorted(set(deptypes)))
|
||||
|
||||
def update_deptypes(self, deptypes):
|
||||
deptypes = tuple(sorted(set(deptypes)))
|
||||
deptypes = set(deptypes)
|
||||
deptypes.update(self.deptypes)
|
||||
deptypes = tuple(sorted(deptypes))
|
||||
changed = self.deptypes != deptypes
|
||||
|
||||
self.deptypes = deptypes
|
||||
return changed
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1801,6 +1804,8 @@ def _find_provider(self, vdep, provider_index):
|
||||
dependency already in this spec.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
assert(vdep.virtual)
|
||||
|
||||
# note that this defensively copies.
|
||||
providers = provider_index.providers_for(vdep)
|
||||
|
||||
# If there is a provider for the vpkg, then use that instead of
|
||||
@ -1830,6 +1835,10 @@ def _merge_dependency(self, dep, deptypes, visited, spec_deps,
|
||||
provider_index):
|
||||
"""Merge the dependency into this spec.
|
||||
|
||||
Caller should assume that this routine can owns the dep parameter
|
||||
(i.e. it needs to be a copy of any internal structures like
|
||||
dependencies on Package class objects).
|
||||
|
||||
This is the core of normalize(). There are some basic steps:
|
||||
|
||||
* If dep is virtual, evaluate whether it corresponds to an
|
||||
@ -1842,6 +1851,7 @@ def _merge_dependency(self, dep, deptypes, visited, spec_deps,
|
||||
constraints into this spec.
|
||||
|
||||
This method returns True if the spec was changed, False otherwise.
|
||||
|
||||
"""
|
||||
changed = False
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1854,7 +1864,8 @@ def _merge_dependency(self, dep, deptypes, visited, spec_deps,
|
||||
dep = provider
|
||||
else:
|
||||
index = ProviderIndex([dep], restrict=True)
|
||||
for vspec in (v for v in spec_deps.values() if v.virtual):
|
||||
items = list(spec_deps.items())
|
||||
for name, vspec in items:
|
||||
if index.providers_for(vspec):
|
||||
vspec._replace_with(dep)
|
||||
del spec_deps[vspec.name]
|
||||
@ -1865,29 +1876,23 @@ def _merge_dependency(self, dep, deptypes, visited, spec_deps,
|
||||
raise UnsatisfiableProviderSpecError(required[0], dep)
|
||||
provider_index.update(dep)
|
||||
|
||||
# If the spec isn't already in the set of dependencies, clone
|
||||
# it from the package description.
|
||||
# If the spec isn't already in the set of dependencies, add it.
|
||||
# Note: dep is always owned by this method. If it's from the
|
||||
# caller, it's a copy from _evaluate_dependency_conditions. If it
|
||||
# comes from a vdep, it's a defensive copy from _find_provider.
|
||||
if dep.name not in spec_deps:
|
||||
spec_deps[dep.name] = dep.copy()
|
||||
spec_deps[dep.name] = dep
|
||||
changed = True
|
||||
else:
|
||||
dspec = spec_deps[dep.name]
|
||||
if self.name not in dspec._dependents:
|
||||
self._add_dependency(dspec, deptypes)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
dependent = dspec._dependents[self.name]
|
||||
changed = dependent.update_deptypes(deptypes)
|
||||
|
||||
# Constrain package information with spec info
|
||||
try:
|
||||
changed |= spec_deps[dep.name].constrain(dep)
|
||||
|
||||
except UnsatisfiableSpecError as e:
|
||||
e.message = "Invalid spec: '%s'. "
|
||||
e.message += "Package %s requires %s %s, but spec asked for %s"
|
||||
e.message %= (spec_deps[dep.name], dep.name,
|
||||
e.constraint_type, e.required, e.provided)
|
||||
raise e
|
||||
# merge package/vdep information into spec
|
||||
try:
|
||||
changed |= spec_deps[dep.name].constrain(dep)
|
||||
except UnsatisfiableSpecError as e:
|
||||
e.message = "Invalid spec: '%s'. "
|
||||
e.message += "Package %s requires %s %s, but spec asked for %s"
|
||||
e.message %= (spec_deps[dep.name], dep.name,
|
||||
e.constraint_type, e.required, e.provided)
|
||||
raise e
|
||||
|
||||
# Add merged spec to my deps and recurse
|
||||
dependency = spec_deps[dep.name]
|
||||
@ -2097,6 +2102,9 @@ def _constrain_dependencies(self, other):
|
||||
changed = False
|
||||
for name in self.common_dependencies(other):
|
||||
changed |= self[name].constrain(other[name], deps=False)
|
||||
if name in self._dependencies:
|
||||
changed |= self._dependencies[name].update_deptypes(
|
||||
other._dependencies[name].deptypes)
|
||||
|
||||
# Update with additional constraints from other spec
|
||||
for name in other.dep_difference(self):
|
||||
|
@ -63,8 +63,7 @@ def _mock(pkg_name, spec, deptypes=spack.alldeps):
|
||||
pkg = spack.repo.get(pkg_name)
|
||||
if pkg_name not in saved_deps:
|
||||
saved_deps[pkg_name] = (pkg, pkg.dependencies.copy())
|
||||
# Change dep spec
|
||||
# XXX(deptype): handle deptypes.
|
||||
|
||||
pkg.dependencies[spec.name] = {Spec(pkg_name): spec}
|
||||
pkg.dependency_types[spec.name] = set(deptypes)
|
||||
return _mock
|
||||
@ -609,6 +608,8 @@ def test_copy_dependencies(self):
|
||||
assert '^mpich2' in s2
|
||||
|
||||
def test_construct_spec_with_deptypes(self):
|
||||
"""Ensure that it is possible to construct a spec with explicit
|
||||
dependency types."""
|
||||
s = Spec('a',
|
||||
Spec('b',
|
||||
['build'], Spec('c')),
|
||||
@ -633,7 +634,12 @@ def test_construct_spec_with_deptypes(self):
|
||||
assert s['f']._dependents['e'].deptypes == ('run',)
|
||||
|
||||
def check_diamond_deptypes(self, spec):
|
||||
"""Validate deptypes in dt-diamond spec."""
|
||||
"""Validate deptypes in dt-diamond spec.
|
||||
|
||||
This ensures that concretization works properly when two packages
|
||||
depend on the same dependency in different ways.
|
||||
|
||||
"""
|
||||
assert spec['dt-diamond']._dependencies[
|
||||
'dt-diamond-left'].deptypes == ('build', 'link')
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user