bazel: Update for use with Fujitsu compiler (#16860)
* bazel: Update for use with Fujitsu compiler * bazel: Fix for use with Fujitsu compiler * bazel: Fix flake8 error * bazel: add conflicts setting for use with Fujitsu compiler * fix flake8 error * fix flake8 error
This commit is contained in:
parent
84e117b497
commit
b0c73c3325
@ -130,6 +130,16 @@ class Bazel(Package):
|
||||
patch('compile-0.4.patch', when='@0.4:0.5')
|
||||
patch('compile-0.3.patch', when='@:0.3')
|
||||
|
||||
# for fcc
|
||||
patch('patch_for_fcc.patch', when='@0.29.1:%fj')
|
||||
patch('patch_for_fcc2.patch', when='@0.25:%fj')
|
||||
conflicts(
|
||||
'%fj',
|
||||
when='@:0.24.1',
|
||||
msg='Fujitsu Compiler cannot build 0.24.1 or less, '
|
||||
'please use a newer release.'
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
patch('disabledepcheck.patch', when='@0.3.2:+nodepfail')
|
||||
patch('disabledepcheck_old.patch', when='@0.3.0:0.3.1+nodepfail')
|
||||
|
||||
@ -201,3 +211,7 @@ def test(self):
|
||||
|
||||
def setup_dependent_package(self, module, dependent_spec):
|
||||
module.bazel = Executable('bazel')
|
||||
|
||||
@property
|
||||
def parallel(self):
|
||||
return not self.spec.satisfies('%fj')
|
||||
|
37
var/spack/repos/builtin/packages/bazel/patch_for_fcc.patch
Normal file
37
var/spack/repos/builtin/packages/bazel/patch_for_fcc.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
|
||||
diff --git a/src/main/cpp/blaze_util_posix.cc b/src/main/cpp/blaze_util_posix.cc
|
||||
index 87ba899180..1c967ee818 100644
|
||||
--- a/src/main/cpp/blaze_util_posix.cc
|
||||
+++ b/src/main/cpp/blaze_util_posix.cc
|
||||
@@ -565,7 +565,8 @@ static int setlk(int fd, struct flock *lock) {
|
||||
// Prefer OFD locks if available. POSIX locks can be lost "accidentally"
|
||||
// due to any close() on the lock file, and are not reliably preserved
|
||||
// across execve() on Linux, which we need for --batch mode.
|
||||
- if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, lock) == 0) return 0;
|
||||
+ //if (fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, lock) == 0) return 0;
|
||||
+ if (fcntl(fd, F_SETLK, lock) == 0) return 0;
|
||||
if (errno != EINVAL) {
|
||||
if (errno != EACCES && errno != EAGAIN) {
|
||||
BAZEL_DIE(blaze_exit_code::LOCAL_ENVIRONMENTAL_ERROR)
|
||||
diff --git a/tools/cpp/unix_cc_configure.bzl b/tools/cpp/unix_cc_configure.bzl
|
||||
index ccb18a431a..0c5c8fd6f0 100644
|
||||
--- a/tools/cpp/unix_cc_configure.bzl
|
||||
+++ b/tools/cpp/unix_cc_configure.bzl
|
||||
@@ -379,7 +379,8 @@ def configure_unix_toolchain(repository_ctx, cpu_value, overriden_tools):
|
||||
"",
|
||||
False,
|
||||
), ":")
|
||||
- gold_linker_path = _find_gold_linker_path(repository_ctx, cc)
|
||||
+ #gold_linker_path = _find_gold_linker_path(repository_ctx, cc)
|
||||
+ gold_linker_path = None
|
||||
cc_path = repository_ctx.path(cc)
|
||||
if not str(cc_path).startswith(str(repository_ctx.path(".")) + "/"):
|
||||
# cc is outside the repository, set -B
|
||||
@@ -468,7 +469,7 @@ def configure_unix_toolchain(repository_ctx, cpu_value, overriden_tools):
|
||||
# Security hardening requires optimization.
|
||||
# We need to undef it as some distributions now have it enabled by default.
|
||||
"-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE",
|
||||
- "-fstack-protector",
|
||||
+ #"-fstack-protector",
|
||||
# All warnings are enabled. Maybe enable -Werror as well?
|
||||
"-Wall",
|
||||
# Enable a few more warnings that aren't part of -Wall.
|
11
var/spack/repos/builtin/packages/bazel/patch_for_fcc2.patch
Normal file
11
var/spack/repos/builtin/packages/bazel/patch_for_fcc2.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
||||
--- a/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/bazel/rules/BazelRuleClassProvider.java
|
||||
+++ b/src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/bazel/rules/BazelRuleClassProvider.java
|
||||
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ public class BazelRuleClassProvider {
|
||||
|
||||
Map<String, String> spackEnv = System.getenv();
|
||||
for (String envName : spackEnv.keySet()) {
|
||||
- if (envName.startsWith("SPACK_")) {
|
||||
+ if ((envName.startsWith("SPACK_")) || (envName.equals("fcc_ENV")) || (envName.equals("FCC_ENV"))) {
|
||||
env.put(envName, spackEnv.get(envName));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user