zhangyiss/spack
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

More packaging documentation

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Todd Gamblin
2014-01-04 14:43:44 -08:00
parent 30d3b32085
commit b579ba213d
2 changed files with 477 additions and 13 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

488
lib/spack/docs/packaging_guide.rst
View File

@@ -9,12 +9,14 @@ about :ref:`specs <sec-specs>`.
There are two key parts of Spack:
#. **specs**: a language for describing builds of software, and
#. **packages**: Python modules that build software according to a
#. **Specs**: expressions for describing builds of software, and
#. **Packages**: Python modules that build software according to a
spec.
The package allows the developer to encapsulate build logic for
different versions, compilers, and platforms in one place.
Package files allow a developer to encapsulate build logic for
different versions, compilers, and platforms in one place. Specs
allow a user to describe a *particular* build in a way that a package
author can understand.
Packages in Spack are written in pure Python, so you can do anything
in Spack that you can do in Python. Python was chosen as the
@@ -70,13 +72,13 @@ Package Names
This package lives in a file called ``libelf.py``, and it contains a
class called ``Libelf``. The ``Libelf`` class extends Spack's
``Package`` class (and this is what makes it a Spack package). The
*file name* is what users need to provide in their package
**file name** is what users need to provide in their package
specs. e.g., if you type any of these:
.. code-block:: sh
spack install libelf
spack install libelf@0.8.13
$ spack install libelf
$ spack install libelf@0.8.13
Spack sees the package name in the spec and looks for a file called
``libelf.py`` in its ``packages`` directory. Likewise, if you say
@@ -95,11 +97,7 @@ You'll get a syntax error because the identifier doesn't start with a
letter or underscore. For more details on why this is still ok, see
the :ref:`developer guide<developer_guide>`.
.. literalinclude:: ../spack/packages/libelf.py
:linenos:
:lines: 3
The *class name* is formed by converting words separated by `-` or
The **class name** is formed by converting words separated by `-` or
``_`` in the file name to camel case. If the name starts with a
number, we prefix the class name with ``Num_``. Here are some
examples:
@@ -172,6 +170,7 @@ Install takes a ``spec`` object and a ``prefix`` path:
.. literalinclude:: ../spack/packages/libelf.py
:start-after: 0.8.12
:linenos:
We'll talk about ``spec`` objects and the types of methods you can
call on them later. The ``prefix`` is the path to the directory where
@@ -418,16 +417,479 @@ syntax errors, or the ``import`` will fail. Use this once you've got
your package in working order.
Optional Package Attributes
------------------------------
In addition to ``homepage``, ``url``, and ``versions``, there are some
other useful attributes you can add to your package file.
``list_url``
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When spack tries to find available versions of packages (e.g. in
``spack checksum``), by default it looks in the parent directory of
the tarball in the package's ``url``. For example, for libelf, the
url is:
.. literalinclude:: ../spack/packages/libelf.py
:start-after: homepage
:end-before: versions
Spack will try to fetch the URL ``http://www.mr511.de/software/``,
scrape the page, and use any links that look like the tarball URL to
find other available versions. For many packages, the tarball's
parent directory may be unlistable, or it may not contain any links to
source code archives. For these, you can specify a separate
``list_url`` indicating the page to search for tarballs. For example,
``libdwarf`` has the homepage as the ``list_url``:
.. literalinclude:: ../spack/packages/libdwarf.py
:start-after: Libdwarf
:end-before: versions
``list_depth``
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Some packages may not have a listing of available verisons on a single
page. For these, you can specify a ``list_depth`` indicating that
Spack should follow links from the ``list_url`` up to a particular
depth. Spack will follow links and search each page reachable from
the ``list_url`` for tarball links. For example, ``mpich`` archives
are stored in a directory tree of versions, so the package looks like
this:
.. literalinclude:: ../spack/packages/mpich.py
:start-after: homepage
:end-before: versions
Dependencies
------------------------------
We've now covered how to build a simple package, but what if one
package relies on another package to build? How do you express that
in a package file? And how do you refer to the other package in the
build script for your own package?
Spack makes this relatively easy. Let's take a look at the
``libdwarf`` package to see how it's done:
.. literalinclude:: ../spack/packages/libdwarf.py
:linenos:
:start-after: dwarf_dirs
:end-before: def clean
:emphasize-lines: 10
:append: ...
``depends_on``
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The ``depends_on('libelf')`` call on line 10 tells Spack that it needs
to build and install the ``libelf`` package before it builds
``libdwarf``. This means that in your ``install()`` method, you are
guaranteed that ``libelf`` has been built and installed successfully,
so you can rely on it for your libdwarf build.
Dependency specs
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
``depends_on`` doesn't just take the name of another package. It
actually takes a full spec. This means that you can restrict the
versions or other configuration options of ``libelf`` that
``libdwarf`` will build with. Here's an example. Suppose that in the
``libdwarf`` package you wrote:
.. code-block:: python
depends_on("libelf@0.8:")
Now ``libdwarf`` will only ever build with ``libelf`` version ``0.8``
or higher. If some versions of ``libelf`` are installed but they are
all older than this, then Spack will build a new version of ``libelf``
that satisfies the spec's version constraint, and it will build
``libdwarf`` with that one. You could just as easily provide a
version range (e.g., ``0.8.2:0.8.4``) or a variant constraint
(e.g.. ``+debug``) to control how dependencies should be built.
Note that both users and package authors can use the same spec syntax
to refer to different package configurations. Users use this syntax
on the command line to find specs or to install specs with particular
constraints, and package authors can use it to describe relationships
between packages.
Virtual dependencies
-----------------------------
In some cases, more than one package can satisfy another package's
dependency. One way this can happen is if a pacakge depends on a
particular *interface*, but there are multiple *implementations* of
the interface, and the package could be built with either. A *very*
common interface in HPC is the `Message Passing Interface (MPI)
<http://www.mcs.anl.gov/research/projects/mpi/>`_, which is used in
many large-scale parallel applications.
MPI has several different implementations (e.g., `MPICH
<http://www.mpich.org>`_, `OpenMPI <http://www.open-mpi.org>`_, and
`MVAPICH <http://mvapich.cse.ohio-state.edu>`_, and scientific
applicaitons can be built with any one of these. Complicating
matters, MPI does not have a standardized ABI, so a package built with
one implementation cannot be relinked with another implementation.
Many pacakage managers handle interfaces like this by requiring many
similar pacakge files, e.g., ``foo``, ``foo-mvapich``, ``foo-mpich``,
but Spack avoids this explosion of package files by providing support
for *virtual dependencies*.
``provides``
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In Spack, ``mpi`` is a *virtual package*. A package can depend on it
just like any other package, by supplying a ``depends_on`` call in the
package definition. In ``mpileaks``, this looks like so:
.. literalinclude:: ../spack/packages/mpileaks.py
:start-after: url
:end-before: install
Here, ``callpath`` is an actual pacakge, but there is no package file
for ``mpi``, so we say it is a *virtual* package. The syntax of
``depends_on``, however, is the same for both.. If we look inside the
package file of an MPI implementation, say MPICH, we'll see something
like this:
.. code-block:: python
class Mpich(Package):
provides('mpi')
...
The ``provides("mpi")`` call tells Spack that the ``mpich`` package
can be substituted whenever a package says it depends on ``mpi``.
Just as you can pass a spec to ``depends_on``, you can pass a spec to
``provides`` to add constraints. This allows Spack to support the
notion of *versioned interfaces*. The MPI standard has gone through
many revisions, each with new functions added. Some packages may
require a recent implementation that supports MPI-3 fuctions, but some
MPI versions may only provide up to MPI-2. You can indicate this by
adding a version constraint to the spec passed to ``provides``:
.. code-block:: python
provides("mpi@:2")
Suppose that the above restriction is in the ``mpich2`` package. This
says that ``mpich2`` provides MPI support *up to* version 2, but if aa
package ``depends_on("mpi@3")``, then Spack will *not* build with ``mpich2``
for the MPI implementation.
``provides when``
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The same package may provide different versions of an interface
depending on *its* version. Above, we simplified the ``provides``
call in ``mpich`` to make the explanation easier. In reality, this is
how ``mpich`` declares the virtual packages it provides:
.. code-block:: python
provides('mpi@:3', when='@3:')
provides('mpi@:1', when='@1:')
The ``when`` argument to ``provides`` (a `keyword argument
<http://docs.python.org/2/tutorial/controlflow.html#keyword-arguments>`_
for those not familiar with Python) allows you to specify optional
constraints on the *calling* package. The calling package will only
provide the declared virtual spec when *it* matches the constraints in
the when clause. Here, when ``mpich`` is at version 3 or higher, it
provides MPI up to version 3. When ``mpich`` is at version 1 or higher,
it provides the MPI virtual pacakge at version 1.
The ``when`` qualifier will ensure that Spack selects a suitably high
version of ``mpich`` to match another package that ``depends_on`` a
particular version of MPI. It will also prevent a user from building
with too low a version of ``mpich``. For example, suppose the package
``foo`` declares that it ``depends_on('mpi@2')``, and a user invokes
``spack install`` like this:
.. code-block:: sh
$ spack install foo ^mpich@1.0
Spack will fail with a constraint violation, because the version of
MPICH requested is too low for the ``mpi`` requirement in ``foo``.
Abstract & concrete specs
------------------------------------------
Now that we've seen how spec constraints can be specified :ref:`on the
command line <sec-specs>` and within package definitions, we can talk
about how Spack puts all of this information together. When you run
this:
.. code-block:: sh
spack install mpileaks ^callpath@1.0+debug ^libelf@0.8.11
Spack parses the command line and builds a spec from the description.
The spec says that ``mpileaks`` should be built with the ``callpath``
library at 1.0 and with the debug option enabled, and with ``libelf``
version 0.8.11. Spack will also look at the ``depends_on`` calls in
all of these packags, and it will build a spec from that. The specs
from the command line and the specs built from package descriptions
are then combined, and the constraints are checked against each other
to make sure they're satisfiable.
What we have after this is done is called an *abstract spec*. An
abstract spec is partially specified. In other words, it could
describe more than one build of a package. Spack does this to make
things easier on the user: they should only have to specify as much of
the package spec as they care about. Here's an example partial spec
DAG, based on the constraints above::
mpileaks
^callpath@1.0+debug
^dyninst
^libdwarf
^libelf@0.8.11
^mpi
This diagram shows a spec DAG output as a tree, where successive
levels of indentation represent a depends-on relationship. In the
above DAG, we can see some packages annotated with their constraints,
and some packages with no annotations at all. When there are no
annotations, it means the user doesn't care what configuration of that
package is built, just so long as it works.
Concretization
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
An abstract spec is useful for the user, but you can't install an
abstract spec. Spack has to take the abstract spec and "fill in" the
remaining unspecified parts in order to install. This process is
called **concretization**. Concretization happens in between the time
the user runs ``spack install`` and the time the ``install()`` method
is called. The concretized version of the spec above might look like
this::
mpileaks@2.3%gcc@4.7.3=macosx_10.8_x86_64
^callpath@1.0%gcc@4.7.3+debug=macosx_10.8_x86_64
^dyninst@8.1.2%gcc@4.7.3=macosx_10.8_x86_64
^libdwarf@20130729%gcc@4.7.3=macosx_10.8_x86_64
^libelf@0.8.11%gcc@4.7.3=macosx_10.8_x86_64
^mpich@3.0.4%gcc@4.7.3=macosx_10.8_x86_64
Here, all versions, compilers, and platforms are filled in, and there
is a single version (no version ranges) for each package. All
decisions about configuration have been made, and only after this
point will Spack call the ``install()`` method for your package.
Concretization in Spack is based on certain selection policies that
tell Spack how to select, e.g., a version, when one is not specified
explicitly. Concretization policies are discussed in more detail in
:ref:`site-configuration`. Sites using Spack can customize them to
match the preferences of their own users.
``spack spec``
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For an arbitrary spec, you can see the result of concretization by
running ``spack spec``. For example:
.. code-block:: sh
$ spack spec dyninst@8.0.1
dyninst@8.0.1
^libdwarf
^libelf
dyninst@8.0.1%gcc@4.7.3=macosx_10.8_x86_64
^libdwarf@20130729%gcc@4.7.3=macosx_10.8_x86_64
^libelf@0.8.13%gcc@4.7.3=macosx_10.8_x86_64
.. _install-environment:
Install environment
-----------------------------
--------------------------
In general, you should not have to do much differently in your install
method than you would when installing a pacakge on the command line.
Spack tries to set environment variables and modify compiler calls so
that it *appears* to the build system that you're building with a
standard system install of everything. Obviously that's not going to
cover *all* build systems, but it should make it easy to port packages
that use standard build systems to Spack.
There are a couple of things that Spack does that help with this:
Compiler interceptors
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Spack intercepts the compiler calls that your build makes. If your
build invokes ``cc``, then Spack intercepts the ``cc`` call with its
own wrapper script, and it inserts ``-I``, ``-L``, and ``-Wl,-rpath``
options for all dependencies before invoking the actual compiler.
An example of this would be the ``libdwarf`` build, which has one
dependency: ``libelf``. Every call to ``cc`` in the ``libdwarf``
build will have ``-I$LIBELF_PREFIX/include``,
``-L$LIBELF_PREFIX/lib``, and ``-Wl,-rpath=$LIBELF_PREFIX/lib``
inserted on the command line. This is done transparently to the
project's build system, which will just think it's using a system
where ``libelf`` is readily available. Because of this, you **do
not** have to insert extra ``-I``, ``-L``, etc. on the command line.
An exmaple of this is the ``libdwarf`` package. You'll notice that it
never mentions ``libelf`` outside of the ``depends_on('libelf')``
call, but it still manages to find its dependency library and build.
This is due to Spack's compiler interceptors.
Environment variables
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.. warning:: Environment variable setting is not fully implemented.
Spack sets a number of standard environment variables so that build
systems use its compiler wrappers for their builds. The standard
enviroment variables are:
======================= =============================
Variable Purpose
======================= =============================
``CC`` C compiler
``CXX`` C++ compiler
``CPP`` C Preprocessor
``F77`` Fortran 77 compiler
``F90`` Fortran 90 compiler
``F95`` Fortran 95 compiler
``CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH`` Path to dependency prefixes for CMake
======================= =============================
All of these are standard variables respected by most build systems,
so if your project uses something like ``autotools`` or ``CMake``,
then it should pick them up automatically when you run ``configure``
or ``cmake`` in your ``install()`` function. Many traditional builds
using GNU Make and BSD make also respect these variables, so they may
work with these systems, as well.
If your build systm does *not* pick these variables up from the
environment automatically, then you can simply pass them on the
command line or us a patch as part of your build process to get the
correct compilers into the project's build system.
Forked process
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.. warning:: This is not implemented yet.
To give packages free reign over how they install things, how they
modify the environemnt, and how they use Spack's internal APIs, we
fork a new process each time we invoke ``install()``. This allows
packages to have their own completely sandboxed build environment,
without impacting other jobs that the main Spack process runs.
Implementing the ``install`` method
------------------------------------------
Now that the metadata is out of the way, we can move on to the
``install()`` method. Recall that the ``install()`` method's
signature looks like this:
.. code-block:: python
class Foo(Package):
def install(self, spec, prefix):
...
The parameters are as follows:
``self``
For those not used to Python instance methods, this is the
package itself. In this case it's an instance of ``Foo``, which
extends ``Package``. For API docs on Package objects, see
:py:class:`Package <spack.package.Package>`.
``spec``
This is the concrete spec object created by Spack from an
abstract spec supplied by the user. It describes what should be
installed. It will be of type :py:class:`Spec <spack.spec.Spec>`.
``prefix``
This is the path that your install method should copy build
targets into. It acts like a string, but it's actually its own
special type, :py:class:`Prefix <spack.util.prefix.Prefix>`.
As mentioned in :ref:`install-environment`, you will usually not need
to refer to most dependencies explicitly in your package file, as
compiler wrapper take care of most of the heavy lifting here. There
will be times, though, when you need to refer to the install locations
of dependencies, or when you need to do something different depending
on the version, compiler, dependencies, etc. that your package is
built with. These parameters give you access to this type of information.
Prefix objects
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For packages that do not have their own install target, or for those
that implement it poorly (like ``libdwarf``), Spack provides the
prefix object so you can manually copy things into the install
directory. You can refer to the prefix directly, e.g.:
.. code-block:: python
configure('--prefix=' + prefix)
The Prefix object will act like a string here. You can also refer to
standard subdirectories without having to construct paths yourself, e.g.:
.. code-block:: python
mkdirp(prefix.bin,
prefix.include,
prefix.lib,
prefix.man1)
Most of the standard UNIX directory names are attributes on the
``prefix`` object.
See :py:class:`spack.prefix.Prefix` to see what paths are available.
Spec operations
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Multimethods
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Shell commands
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

2
lib/spack/docs/site_configuration.rst
View File

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
.. _site-configuration:
Site-specific configuration
===================================