update documentation.

This commit is contained in:
Todd Gamblin 2016-05-21 14:33:05 -07:00
parent d94972503a
commit d087086581
3 changed files with 74 additions and 66 deletions

View File

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
.. _site-configuration:
.. _configuration:
Site configuration
Configuration
===================================
.. _temp-space:
@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ directory is.
External Packages
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
----------------------------
Spack can be configured to use externally-installed
packages rather than building its own packages. This may be desirable
if machines ship with system packages, such as a customized MPI
@ -123,8 +123,68 @@ It could also be used alone to forbid packages that may be
buggy or otherwise undesirable.
Concretization Preferences
--------------------------------
Spack can be configured to prefer certain compilers, package
versions, depends_on, and variants during concretization.
The preferred configuration can be controlled via the
``~/.spack/packages.yaml`` file for user configuations, or the
``etc/spack/packages.yaml`` site configuration.
Here's an example packages.yaml file that sets preferred packages:
.. code-block:: sh
packages:
dyninst:
compiler: [gcc@4.9]
variants: +debug
gperftools:
version: [2.2, 2.4, 2.3]
all:
compiler: [gcc@4.4.7, gcc@4.6:, intel, clang, pgi]
providers:
mpi: [mvapich, mpich, openmpi]
At a high level, this example is specifying how packages should be
concretized. The dyninst package should prefer using gcc 4.9 and
be built with debug options. The gperftools package should prefer version
2.2 over 2.4. Every package on the system should prefer mvapich for
its MPI and gcc 4.4.7 (except for Dyninst, which overrides this by preferring gcc 4.9).
These options are used to fill in implicit defaults. Any of them can be overwritten
on the command line if explicitly requested.
Each packages.yaml file begins with the string ``packages:`` and
package names are specified on the next level. The special string ``all``
applies settings to each package. Underneath each package name is
one or more components: ``compiler``, ``variants``, ``version``,
or ``providers``. Each component has an ordered list of spec
``constraints``, with earlier entries in the list being preferred over
later entries.
Sometimes a package installation may have constraints that forbid
the first concretization rule, in which case Spack will use the first
legal concretization rule. Going back to the example, if a user
requests gperftools 2.3 or later, then Spack will install version 2.4
as the 2.4 version of gperftools is preferred over 2.3.
An explicit concretization rule in the preferred section will always
take preference over unlisted concretizations. In the above example,
xlc isn't listed in the compiler list. Every listed compiler from
gcc to pgi will thus be preferred over the xlc compiler.
The syntax for the ``provider`` section differs slightly from other
concretization rules. A provider lists a value that packages may
``depend_on`` (e.g, mpi) and a list of rules for fulfilling that
dependency.
Profiling
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
------------------
Spack has some limited built-in support for profiling, and can report
statistics using standard Python timing tools. To use this feature,
@ -133,7 +193,7 @@ supply ``-p`` to Spack on the command line, before any subcommands.
.. _spack-p:
``spack -p``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
``spack -p`` output looks like this:

View File

@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Table of Contents
basic_usage
packaging_guide
mirrors
site_configuration
configuration
developer_guide
command_index
package_list

View File

@ -1648,8 +1648,8 @@ point will Spack call the ``install()`` method for your package.
Concretization in Spack is based on certain selection policies that
tell Spack how to select, e.g., a version, when one is not specified
explicitly. Concretization policies are discussed in more detail in
:ref:`site-configuration`. Sites using Spack can customize them to
match the preferences of their own users.
:ref:`configuration`. Sites using Spack can customize them to match
the preferences of their own users.
.. _spack-spec:
@ -1682,60 +1682,8 @@ be concretized on their system. For example, one user may prefer packages
built with OpenMPI and the Intel compiler. Another user may prefer
packages be built with MVAPICH and GCC.
Spack can be configured to prefer certain compilers, package
versions, depends_on, and variants during concretization.
The preferred configuration can be controlled via the
``~/.spack/packages.yaml`` file for user configuations, or the
``etc/spack/packages.yaml`` site configuration.
Here's an example packages.yaml file that sets preferred packages:
.. code-block:: sh
packages:
dyninst:
compiler: [gcc@4.9]
variants: +debug
gperftools:
version: [2.2, 2.4, 2.3]
all:
compiler: [gcc@4.4.7, gcc@4.6:, intel, clang, pgi]
providers:
mpi: [mvapich, mpich, openmpi]
At a high level, this example is specifying how packages should be
concretized. The dyninst package should prefer using gcc 4.9 and
be built with debug options. The gperftools package should prefer version
2.2 over 2.4. Every package on the system should prefer mvapich for
its MPI and gcc 4.4.7 (except for Dyninst, which overrides this by preferring gcc 4.9).
These options are used to fill in implicit defaults. Any of them can be overwritten
on the command line if explicitly requested.
Each packages.yaml file begins with the string ``packages:`` and
package names are specified on the next level. The special string ``all``
applies settings to each package. Underneath each package name is
one or more components: ``compiler``, ``variants``, ``version``,
or ``providers``. Each component has an ordered list of spec
``constraints``, with earlier entries in the list being preferred over
later entries.
Sometimes a package installation may have constraints that forbid
the first concretization rule, in which case Spack will use the first
legal concretization rule. Going back to the example, if a user
requests gperftools 2.3 or later, then Spack will install version 2.4
as the 2.4 version of gperftools is preferred over 2.3.
An explicit concretization rule in the preferred section will always
take preference over unlisted concretizations. In the above example,
xlc isn't listed in the compiler list. Every listed compiler from
gcc to pgi will thus be preferred over the xlc compiler.
The syntax for the ``provider`` section differs slightly from other
concretization rules. A provider lists a value that packages may
``depend_on`` (e.g, mpi) and a list of rules for fulfilling that
dependency.
See the `documentation in the config section <concretization-preferences_>`_
for more details.
.. _install-method: