These are some changes that `ruff check --fix` would make that the current
`spack style` also agrees with. Make the changes now so that the `ruff`
change is less disruptive.
Signed-off-by: Todd Gamblin <tgamblin@llnl.gov>
The import-check action now presents problematic import statements
introduced by the PR better.
The idea is roughly:
* Let (V₁, E₁) be the graph of modules as vertices and import statements
as edges before the change
* Let (V₂, E₂) be the graph after the code change, which is typically a small
perturbation of (V₁, E₁).
* X₁ = FAS(V₁, E₁) is the feedback arc set before (a minimal set of edges to
delete to make it acyclic)
* X₂ = FAS(V₂, E₂ ∖ X₁) is the feedback arc set after deletion of the minimal
set of edges that made the old graph acyclic.
* X₃ = FAS(V₂, E₂) is the feedback arc set after
Previously I displayed X₁ and X₃ and users had to diff themselves.
Now, I'm showing X₂, which is a small set, typically directly related to
code changes.
However, it can be that a small code change adding say 2 problematic imports
creates a completely different solution X₃ that only requires deletion of just 1
different import. In that case the user is informed that they can potentially do
less work.
So for PR #48784 the output is now:
> The overall number of problematic import statements increased by 1 from 31 to 32.
> This is likely a direct consequence of the following import statements:
>
> ```
> spack/config imports: spack.spec, spack.util.path, spack.util.remote_file_cache
> ```
>
> However, instead of removing 3 import statements, it is sufficient to remove only 1
> import statement from the following list:
>
> ```
> spack/concretize imports: spack.bootstrap, spack.solver.asp
> spack/environment imports: spack.bootstrap, spack.environment
> spack/fetch_strategy imports: spack.version.git_ref_lookup
> spack/install_test imports: spack.build_environment, spack.package_base
> spack/modules imports: spack.modules
> spack/platforms imports: spack.config
> spack/relocate imports: spack.bootstrap
> spack/repo imports: spack.package_base, spack.patch, spack.tag
> spack/spec imports: spack.binary_distribution, spack.compiler, spack.compilers, spack.concretize, spack.environment, spack.hash_types, spack.provider_index, spack.repo, spack.spec_parser, spack.store, spack.traverse, spack.variant, spack.version.git_ref_lookup
> spack/subprocess_context imports: spack.environment
> spack/util/gpg imports: spack.bootstrap
> spack/util/package_hash imports: spack.package_base
> spack/util/path imports: spack.config, spack.environment
> spack/util/remote_file_cache imports: spack.util.web
> ```
from which the user can figure out that
`spack/util/remote_file_cache imports: spack.util.web` is the "bottleneck" now.
* Add versions 2 and 3 of py-sphinx-rtd-theme.
Allow for versions of py-sphinx greater than 6.
Fix the Python version for older versions that depend on distutils.
Get the py-docutils dependency from the py-sphinx recipe.
* Depend purely on the py-docutils dependency in py-sphinx.
* More refined dependency versioning.
* Fixed versioning for py-sphinx and py-docutils.
Currently, environments created from manifest files with relative includes result in broken
references to config files.
This PR modifies `spack env create` to create local copies in the new environment of any local
config files from relative paths in the environment manifest passed as an init file.
This PR does not change the behavior if the include is an absolute path or if the include is from
a relative path outside the environment directory, but it does warn about missing relative includes if
they are inside the environment directory.
Includes regression test and short blurb in docs.
* Added salt variant to tau
* Update package.py
* [@spackbot] updating style on behalf of wspear
---------
Co-authored-by: wspear <wspear@users.noreply.github.com>
