Codecov needs to see the token secret when uploading, so we have to
add this line to the workflow YAML:
```yaml
with:
token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}
```
Signed-off-by: Todd Gamblin <tgamblin@llnl.gov>
* Remove variable from cmake.py
#48775 left a dangling variable that was not caught in CI but by the eyes of @haampie. Restructure variable to local method.
* [@spackbot] updating style on behalf of psakievich
* Update cmake.py
* Update lib/spack/spack/build_systems/cmake.py
* Update lib/spack/spack/build_systems/cmake.py
---------
Co-authored-by: psakievich <psakievich@users.noreply.github.com>
* Fix upcxx problem with a template argument list is expected after a name prefixed by the template keyword
* Revert "Fix upcxx problem with a template argument list is expected after a name prefixed by the template keyword"
This reverts commit faf9b8ce85.
* Apply workaround for oneAPI compiler
* style problem resolved
* use spec.satisfies syntax
---------
Co-authored-by: eugeneswalker <eugenesunsetwalker@gmail.com>
Add ruff configuration to `pyproject.toml`.
This allows `ruff format` in the Spack repository to format all the files we care about,
with our line length of 99, the exceptions we already put in place, and excluding things
we don't auto-format, like vendored dependencies.
Right now it'll reformat 175 or so files, but only slightly, in places where `ruff` differs from
`black`. For the most part I like the ruff format decisions better than `black`, but none of
the changes seem too severe.
This does not change `spack style` -- I figure that can come later but this at least will
let people start playing with `ruff`.
---------
Signed-off-by: Todd Gamblin <tgamblin@llnl.gov>
These are some changes that `ruff check --fix` would make that the current
`spack style` also agrees with. Make the changes now so that the `ruff`
change is less disruptive.
Signed-off-by: Todd Gamblin <tgamblin@llnl.gov>
The import-check action now presents problematic import statements
introduced by the PR better.
The idea is roughly:
* Let (V₁, E₁) be the graph of modules as vertices and import statements
as edges before the change
* Let (V₂, E₂) be the graph after the code change, which is typically a small
perturbation of (V₁, E₁).
* X₁ = FAS(V₁, E₁) is the feedback arc set before (a minimal set of edges to
delete to make it acyclic)
* X₂ = FAS(V₂, E₂ ∖ X₁) is the feedback arc set after deletion of the minimal
set of edges that made the old graph acyclic.
* X₃ = FAS(V₂, E₂) is the feedback arc set after
Previously I displayed X₁ and X₃ and users had to diff themselves.
Now, I'm showing X₂, which is a small set, typically directly related to
code changes.
However, it can be that a small code change adding say 2 problematic imports
creates a completely different solution X₃ that only requires deletion of just 1
different import. In that case the user is informed that they can potentially do
less work.
So for PR #48784 the output is now:
> The overall number of problematic import statements increased by 1 from 31 to 32.
> This is likely a direct consequence of the following import statements:
>
> ```
> spack/config imports: spack.spec, spack.util.path, spack.util.remote_file_cache
> ```
>
> However, instead of removing 3 import statements, it is sufficient to remove only 1
> import statement from the following list:
>
> ```
> spack/concretize imports: spack.bootstrap, spack.solver.asp
> spack/environment imports: spack.bootstrap, spack.environment
> spack/fetch_strategy imports: spack.version.git_ref_lookup
> spack/install_test imports: spack.build_environment, spack.package_base
> spack/modules imports: spack.modules
> spack/platforms imports: spack.config
> spack/relocate imports: spack.bootstrap
> spack/repo imports: spack.package_base, spack.patch, spack.tag
> spack/spec imports: spack.binary_distribution, spack.compiler, spack.compilers, spack.concretize, spack.environment, spack.hash_types, spack.provider_index, spack.repo, spack.spec_parser, spack.store, spack.traverse, spack.variant, spack.version.git_ref_lookup
> spack/subprocess_context imports: spack.environment
> spack/util/gpg imports: spack.bootstrap
> spack/util/package_hash imports: spack.package_base
> spack/util/path imports: spack.config, spack.environment
> spack/util/remote_file_cache imports: spack.util.web
> ```
from which the user can figure out that
`spack/util/remote_file_cache imports: spack.util.web` is the "bottleneck" now.
