Adding binary provenance requires we track the commit.
Typically this has been an optional form for the encompassing git ref.
Moving towards always defining a commit means we need to have space
to store a user requested ref that will then be paired with a commit
sha.
* Add recursive argument to spack develop
This effort allows for a recursive develop call
which will traverse from the develop spec given back to the root(s)
and mark all packages along the path as develop.
If people are doing development across the graph then paying
fetch and full rebuild costs every time spack develop is called
is unnecessary and expensive.
Also remove the constraint for concrete specs and simply take the
max(version) if a version is not given. This should default to the
highest infinity version which is also the logical best guess for
doing development.
Add a CI check to automatically verify the checksums of newly added
package versions:
- [x] a new command, `spack ci verify-versions`
- [x] a GitHub actions check to run the command
- [x] tests for the new command
This also eliminates the suggestion for maintainers to manually verify added
checksums in the case of accidental version <--> checksum mismatches.
----
Signed-off-by: Todd Gamblin <tgamblin@llnl.gov>
The package was added in 2017, and never updated
substantially. It requires users to login into
a platform to download code.
Thus, instead of updating to new versions, and add
support for OneAPI, remove the package.
Signed-off-by: Massimiliano Culpo <massimiliano.culpo@gmail.com>
Fixes#49403.
When one scope included another, we were appending to a list stored on the scope to
track what was included, and we would clear the list when the scope was removed.
This assumes that the scopes are always strictly pushed then popped, but the order can
be violated when serializing config scopes across processes (and then activating
environments in subprocesses), or if, e.g., instead of removing each scope we simply
cleared the list of config scopes. Removal can be skipped, which can cause the list of
includes on a cached scope (like the one we use for environments) to grow every time it
is pushed, and this triggers an assertion error.
There isn't actually a need to construct and destroy the include list. We can just
compute it once and cache it -- it's the same every time.
- [x] Cache included scope list on scope objects
- [x] Do not dynamically append/clear the included scope list
Signed-off-by: Todd Gamblin <tgamblin@llnl.gov>
