Explicitly import package utilities in all packages, and corresponding fallout.
This includes:
* rename `spack.package` to `spack.package_base`
* rename `spack.pkgkit` to `spack.package`
* update all packages in builtin, builtin_mock and tutorials to include `from spack.package import *`
* update spack style
* ensure packages include the import
* automatically add the new import and remove any/all imports of `spack` and `spack.pkgkit`
from packages when using `--fix`
* add support for type-checking packages with mypy when SPACK_MYPY_CHECK_PACKAGES
is set in the environment
* fix all type checking errors in packages in spack upstream
* update spack create to include the new imports
* update spack repo to inject the new import, injection persists to allow for a deprecation period
Original message below:
As requested @adamjstewart, update all packages to use pkgkit. I ended up using isort to do this,
so repro is easy:
```console
$ isort -a 'from spack.pkgkit import *' --rm 'spack' ./var/spack/repos/builtin/packages/*/package.py
$ spack style --fix
```
There were several line spacing fixups caused either by space manipulation in isort or by packages
that haven't been touched since we added requirements, but there are no functional changes in here.
* [x] add config to isort to make sure this is maintained going forward
* Make boost composable
Currently Boost enables a few components through variants by default,
which means that if you want to use only what you need and no more, you
have to explicitly disable these variants, leading to concretization
errors whenever a second package explicitly needs those components.
For instance if package A only needs `+component_a` it might depend on
`boost +component_a ~component_b`. And if packge B only needs
`+component_b` it might depend on `boost ~component_a +component_b`. If
package C now depends on both A and B, this leads to unsatisfiable
variants and hence a concretization error.
However, if we default to disabling all components, package A can simply
depend on `boost +component_a` and package B on `boost +component_b` and
package C will concretize to depending on `boost +component_a
+component_b`, and whatever you install, you get the bare minimum.
* Fix style
* Added composable boost dependencies for folly
* fixing akantu merge issue
* hpctoolkit boost dependencies already defined
* Fix Styles
* Fixup style once more
* Adding isort fix
* isort one more time
* Fix for package audit issue
Co-authored-by: Harmen Stoppels <harmenstoppels@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan O'Malley <rd.omalley@comcast.net>
This PR will add a new audit, specifically for spack package homepage urls (and eventually
other kinds I suspect) to see if there is an http address that can be changed to https.
Usage is as follows:
```bash
$ spack audit packages-https <package>
```
And in list view:
```bash
$ spack audit list
generic:
Generic checks relying on global variables
configs:
Sanity checks on compilers.yaml
Sanity checks on packages.yaml
packages:
Sanity checks on specs used in directives
packages-https:
Sanity checks on https checks of package urls, etc.
```
I think it would be unwise to include with packages, because when run for all, since we do requests it takes a long time. I also like the idea of more well scoped checks - likely there will be other addresses for http/https within a package that we eventually check. For now, there are two error cases - one is when an https url is tried but there is some SSL error (or other error that means we cannot update to https):
```bash
$ spack audit packages-https zoltan
PKG-HTTPS-DIRECTIVES: 1 issue found
1. Error with attempting https for "zoltan":
<urlopen error [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed: Hostname mismatch, certificate is not valid for 'www.cs.sandia.gov'. (_ssl.c:1125)>
```
This is either not fixable, or could be fixed with a change to the url or (better) contacting the site owners to ask about some certificate or similar.
The second case is when there is an http that needs to be https, which is a huge issue now, but hopefully not after this spack PR.
```bash
$ spack audit packages-https xman
Package "xman" uses http but has a valid https endpoint.
```
And then when a package is fixed:
```bash
$ spack audit packages-https zlib
PKG-HTTPS-DIRECTIVES: 0 issues found.
```
And that's mostly it. :)
Signed-off-by: vsoch <vsoch@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: vsoch <vsoch@users.noreply.github.com>
- [x] add `concretize.lp`, `spack.yaml`, etc. to licensed files
- [x] update all licensed files to say 2013-2021 using
`spack license update-copyright-year`
- [x] appease mypy with some additions to package.py that needed
for oneapi.py
- remove the old LGPL license headers from all files in Spack
- add SPDX headers to all files
- core and most packages are (Apache-2.0 OR MIT)
- a very small number of remaining packages are LGPL-2.1-only
* Rename packages
* Upcasing depends_on() in packages.
* Downcased extends('r')
* Fixed erroneously changed URL that had slipped through.
* Fixed typo
* Fixed link from documentation into package source code.
* Fixed another doc problem.
* Changed underscores to dashes in package names.
* Added test to enforce lowercase, no-underscore naming convention.
* Fix r-xgboost
* Downcase more instances of 'R' in package auto-creation.
* Fix test.
* Converted unit test packages to use dashes not underscores
* Downcase `r` in the docs.
* Update module_file_support.rst
Fix r->R for class R.
