- allow conduit=ofi-slingshot11 to work with regular OpenMPI and MPICH when
they are built with ^libfabric fabrics=cxi.
- add missing libfabric dependency for conduit=ofi-slingshot11. Embedded GASNet
build uses PATH to detect libfabric installation.
This explicitly specifies the correct library for zlib to CMake:
CMake's find zlib looks for zlib before zdll. On Windows, zlib is the
static lib, and zdll the import library. LibPNG only links to shared
zlib, but was getting zlib from CMake on Windows, which was resulting
in a linker failure.
* TestSuite: add type hints
* spack test run: add a --timeout argument
* pipelines: allow 2 minutes to run tests
* Fix docstrings, increase maximum pipelines time for tests to 5 mins.
* Use SIGTERM first, SIGKILL shortly after
* Add unit-tests for "start_build_process"
---------
Signed-off-by: Massimiliano Culpo <massimiliano.culpo@gmail.com>
* pressio: add packages for pressio, pressio-ops, and pressio-log
* pressio: use symlinks for pressio-ops/log; specify compatible versions
* pressio: refactor supported versions, update pressio-ops to use main branch
* pressio: update package after renaming repository to pressio-rom
* pressio: remove unneeded if statement
---------
Co-authored-by: Caleb Schilly <cwschilly@gmail.com>
Multiple build systems have been part of Spack for a long
time now, and they are rarely the cause of a missing attribute.
Signed-off-by: Massimiliano Culpo <massimiliano.culpo@gmail.com>
Similar to the range-or-specific-version ambiguity of `@1.2` in the past,
which was solved with `@1.2` vs `@=1.2` we still have the ambiguity of
`name=a,b,c` in multi-valued variants. Do they mean "at least a,b,c" or
"exactly a,b,c"?
This issue comes up in for example `gcc languages=c,cxx`; there's no
way to exclude `fortran`.
The ambiguity is resolved with syntax `:=` to distinguish concrete from
abstract.
The following strings parse as **concrete** variants:
* `name:=a,b,c` => values exactly {a, b, c}
* `name:=a` => values exactly {a}
* `+name` => values exactly {True}
* `~name` => values exactly {False}
The following strings parse as **abstract** variants:
* `name=a,b,c` values at least {a, b, c}
* `name=*` special case for testing existence of a variant; values are at
least the empty set {}
As a reminder
* `satisfies(lhs, rhs)` means `concretizations(lhs)` ⊆ `concretizations(rhs)`
* `intersects(lhs, rhs)` means `concretizations(lhs)` ∩ `concretizations(rhs)` ≠ ∅
where `concretizations(...)` is the set of sets of variant values in this case.
The satisfies semantics are:
* rhs abstract: rhs values is a subset of lhs values (whether lhs is abstract or concrete)
* lhs concrete, rhs concrete: set equality
* lhs abstract, rhs concrete: false
and intersects should mean
* lhs and rhs abstract: true (the union is a valid concretization under both)
* lhs or rhs abstract: true iff the abstract variant's values are a subset of the concrete one
* lhs concrete, rhs concrete: set equality
Concrete specs with single-valued variants are printed `+foo`, `~foo` and `foo=bar`;
only multi-valued variants are printed with `foo:=bar,baz` to reduce the visual noise.
