![]() The goal of this PR is to make clearer where we need a package object in Spack as opposed to a package class. We currently instantiate a lot of package objects when we could make do with a class. We should use the class when we only need metadata, and we should only instantiate and us an instance of `PackageBase` at build time. Modifications: - [x] Remove the `spack.repo.get` convenience function (which was used in many places, and not really needed) - [x] Use `spack.repo.path.get_pkg_class` wherever possible - [x] Try to route most of the need for `spack.repo.path.get` through `Spec.package` - [x] Introduce a non-data descriptor, that can be used as a decorator, to have "class level properties" - [x] Refactor unit tests that had to be modified to reduce code duplication - [x] `Spec.package` and `Repo.get` now require a concrete spec as input - [x] Remove `RepoPath.all_packages` and `Repo.all_packages` |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
docs | ||
env | ||
external | ||
llnl | ||
spack |