97ea57e59f
The gcc compiler can be configured to use `ld.gold` by default. It will then call `ld.gold` explicitly when linking. When so, spack need to have a ld.gold wrapper in PATH to inject rpaths link flags etc... Also I wouldn't be surprised to see some package calling `ld.gold` directly. As for ld.gold, the argument could be made that we want to support any package that could call ld.lld. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| aocc | ||
| arm | ||
| case-insensitive | ||
| cce | ||
| clang | ||
| fj | ||
| gcc | ||
| intel | ||
| nag | ||
| nvhpc | ||
| oneapi | ||
| pgi | ||
| xl | ||
| xl_r | ||
| c89 | ||
| c99 | ||
| c++ | ||
| cc | ||
| cpp | ||
| f77 | ||
| f90 | ||
| f95 | ||
| fc | ||
| ftn | ||
| ld | ||
| ld.gold | ||
| ld.lld | ||