97ea57e59f
The gcc compiler can be configured to use `ld.gold` by default. It will then call `ld.gold` explicitly when linking. When so, spack need to have a ld.gold wrapper in PATH to inject rpaths link flags etc... Also I wouldn't be surprised to see some package calling `ld.gold` directly. As for ld.gold, the argument could be made that we want to support any package that could call ld.lld. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| docs | ||
| env | ||
| external | ||
| llnl | ||
| spack | ||